California crops and oil wastewater


This doesn’t just affect California’s — most of the nation’s produce is grown there. So it seems urgent that this is dealt with:

Until now, government authorities have only required limited testing of recycled irrigation water, checking for naturally occurring toxins such as salts and arsenic, using decades-old monitoring standards. They haven’t screened for the range of chemicals used in modern oil production.

No one knows whether nuts, citrus or other crops grown with the recycled oil field water have been contaminated. Farmers may test crops for pests or disease, but they don’t check for water-borne chemicals. Instead, they rely on oversight by state and local water authorities. But experts say that testing of both the water and the produce should be expanded.

Last month, the Central Valley water authority, which regulates the water recycling program, notified all oil producers of new, broader testing requirements and ordered the companies to begin checking for chemicals covered under California’s new fracking disclosure regulations. The law, which legislators approved last year, requires oil companies to tell the state which chemicals they use in oil-extraction processes. The water authority gave producers until June 15 to report their results.

“We need to make sure we fully understand what goes into the wastewater,” said Clay Rodgers, assistant executive officer of the Central Valley Water Quality Control Board.

One environmental group has tested the irrigation water for oil field chemicals. Over the last two years, Scott Smith, chief scientist for the advocacy group Water Defense, collected samples of the treated irrigation water that the Cawelo Water District buys from Chevron. Laboratory analysis of those samples found compounds that are toxic to humans, including acetone and methylene chloride — powerful industrial solvents — along with oil.

Water Defense, founded by actor Mark Ruffalo in 2010, works to promote access to clean water by testing local supplies and documenting contamination.

When I talk to growers, and they smell the oil field crap in that water, they assume the soil is taking care of this.
– Blake Sanden, an agriculture extension agent and irrigation water expert with UC Davis

Sarah Oktay, a water testing expert and director of the Nantucket field station of the University of Massachusetts Boston, reviewed Smith’s methods and the laboratory analysis of the water he sampled.

“I wouldn’t necessarily panic, but I would certainly think I would rather not have that,” she said, referring to the chemicals identified in the water samples. “My next step would be most likely to look and make sure the crop is healthy.”

State Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills) is sponsoring legislation that would require expanded testing of water produced in oil operations. The Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources, which regulates the state’s oil and gas industry, is already facing lawmakers’ ire after the recent discovery that about 2,500 oil wastewater injection wells were allowed to operate in aquifers that, under federal standards, contain clean water.

Pavley said it is “obviously unacceptable” that oil contaminants are found in irrigation water. “Anyone would be extremely concerned.”

Chevron and the water district say that the water is safe for use on crops, citing the fact that they are complying with testing requirements under the wastewater discharge permit issued by the Central Valley water authority.

4 thoughts on “California crops and oil wastewater

  1. As long as our kitchen faucets don’t catch on fire more than once a day, then we’re OK.

  2. In the LATimes article, I love how the industry spokesbeak is saying, “Safe! Perfectly safe! Of course, it’s safe!” when the whole rest of the article is about how they don’t even test for petrochemicals.

    The other beauty part: the oil companies sell the wastewater to the farmers. And because they’re such good guys, they charge them only half of what regular water costs. Such a deal! And the oil companies don’t have to figure out how to dispose of their waste!

  3. The State Water Resources Control Board, for all their bluster has been asleep at the wheel for years. In Kern County around Taft, ponds are dug and oil wastewater is placed in the ponds to soak into the ground. Wastewater (domestic) has been land applied for years without making it meet drinking water standards, but monitoring wells are dug to make sure the aquifer is not tainted. Bacteria in soil (always there and naturally occurring) are relied upon to finish treatment. Hay fields are sprayed with no disinfection of wastewater. Just ask Barstow how well that went at their Wastewater plant. If you don’t know what to test for (proprietary) and then don’t test for it, who knows if plants take it up and deposit it in their fruit? Just drive up 33 north from Mariposa and see the thousands of oil wells interspersed with tangerine, pistachio and almond orchards. Of course the hydrocarbons in the air (yes, you can smell them) never deposit themselves on the fruit. The hulls are never fed to cattle as feed. and the oil wastewater never leaves a slime or sheen on their delivery canals. why regulate it? Reminds me of the plan to take the liquid wastes from the landfill by Quincy and E470 in Denver, which somehow had plutonium wastes in it–60 miles from Rocky Flats and no manifests of delivery, and place it in the wastewater collection system so the “bugs” in the wastewater can help process it. Trouble is the effluent is and was not tested for radioactivity and neither are the land applied biosolids. They are not part of the permit so no one checks. and crops with radioactive waste applied can then enter the food chain. yay!

Comments are closed.