Other than the fact that I thought giving him the nomination would be a mistake for many of these same reasons.
No comment
4 thoughts on “No comment”
Comments are closed.
Other than the fact that I thought giving him the nomination would be a mistake for many of these same reasons.
Comments are closed.
The people who think that Hillary would have made a better president than Obama has, are as crazy as the people who thought that Obama was the Messiah. The 1% runs this show. They do not want creative thinkers in the WH. What they want are Type-A non-creative thinkers like the Bush’s, the Clintons, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, etc. Kennedy was a danger to them because he knew who they were, how they thought and how to get over on them. He was assassinated before he got very far. The real question is not how Obama fooled so many “stupid” people into believing their own fantasies (“there’s a sucker born every minute”), but how has he managed not to be assassinated by the 1% yet?
Joy Reid, an actual journalist, details the myth of O’s progressive majority and lists admin’s legislative accomplishments: http://blog.reidreport.com/2011/07/myth-of-progressive-majority/. Actual facts might help your case pesky things though they be.
And whose Senate majority leader insisted on keeping that 60-vote majority rule? And refused to use the constitutional option?
Let’s see. The majority party in the Senate elects the leader. Constitutional option fail and you by extension blame His O’ness for Reid’s lack of cojones?
Don’t blame me; I voted for Hillary. If Hil were elected howev’, can’t conceive of more progressive possible agenda given the constraints.