Avi’s Menorah…

This is an essay written from a friend I grew up with, Mike Weiss. We went to Middle and High School together in NW Atlanta…

“Avi’s Menorah: A Personal Essay”

By Mike Weiss

This is my attempt to process the latest twenty-first century horror, once again featuring the casual, even gleeful slaughter of children, along with other ghastly spectacles unfolding before our eyes in Israel and Gaza. Vapid, misinformed social media hot takes spew forth from both the right and the left. Venomous screeds from people aligned with or sympathetic to various tribes fetishize “resistance” or call for a genocidal “holy war” against the “other.” I am tempted to smash or torch every electronic device within my immediate vicinity.

I am a second generation American child of the Jewish Diaspora of the early twentieth century. All four of my grandparents landed here as children, barely escaping the murderous pogroms of Russia, Poland, and Romania, harbingers of an even greater catastrophe soon to unfold from 1933–1945. My paternal grandfather arrived as an undocumented immigrant, owing to cleverly designed quotas crafted by the United States Congress to keep people like him out. He worked as a common laborer in Detroit in the years prior to the Second World War.

Around that time, a widely read magazine article composed by a respected U.S. author described people like my grandfather (Polish Jews) as “parasites” posing a lethal threat to the Anglo-Saxon-Nordic purity which made America great. Virtually all family members my grandfather left behind ultimately met their end as piles of ash in Nazi ovens. Their executioners were inspired in no small part by the racialist theories featured in scholarly works composed by learned men safely ensconced in the ivory towers of British and American universities.

My grandparents never talked about the Old Country. It took me decades to understand why.

Like so many of my generation, I have reaped the benefits of all that America had to offer, thanks to those who have gone before me. My grandfather found work in defense plants and eventually opened his own businesses after the war. His younger brother, a U.S. Army paratrooper, died in the effort to wipe the Third Reich and all of its poisonous platitudes from the face of the earth. “Never again,” as the famous phrase goes.

From there, the story unfolds in one continuous upward arc of progress and privilege. First generation children of immigrants, educated in excellent, low-cost American public schools and universities, passed on their good fortune to kids like me. Born with both a relentless work ethic and a failing heart, my grandfather dropped dead at age sixty three. But the ripple effects of his courage, fortitude, and good fortune continue to this day.

I received a Jewish religious education until age thirteen. I bailed after my Bar Mitzvah, and my parents relented. They no longer pressed the issue, having fulfilled an obligation they felt to honor their immigrant parents’ heritage and sacrifices. I never quite let go of my Jewish identity, however, despite the strange new world I found myself wandering through. I made a rather weird college choice, ending up at a small Presbyterian school in the mountains of Tennessee. I spent most of my four years there as the only Jewish student on campus. I received an excellent liberal arts education which serves me still, while developing some close friendships along the way.

In other ways, my alma mater was not a great fit. Conspicuous as a non-Christian outsider, I became a “special project” for some of my enthusiastic evangelical classmates. One of my closest friends at the time occasionally needled me with “Holocaust jokes,” evoking howls of laughter from those seated around us in the dining hall. “You know I’m just kidding, right man?” Today he is an unapologetic MAGA zealot, and it all kind of makes sense now. Most of my fellow students were decent people who eyed me curiously from a distance. I do not blame them for the alienation I felt, because I made my own choices.

From time to time, the temptation to transfer tugged at me, but I hung in there. Despite being cast as a bit of a stranger on this campus, I emerged as a marginal leader, earning an appointment as a dormitory Resident Assistant (RA) in my junior year.

At the start of that year, our dorm supervisor briefed the RAs on the new freshman boys moving into our quads for the upcoming semester. He told me I was getting an “exchange student from Israel” named Avi. “Cool,” I thought. “Someone I can relate to.” But the dorm supervisor’s understanding of Middle East geopolitics was simplistic. I soon learned that Avi was a Palestinian Arab from the occupied West Bank. A couple of years younger than me, Avi’s home would have been located in the Arab nation of Jordan upon his birth. By the time he turned five, Avi and his family lived under the rule of the victorious Jewish State of Israel as a result of the 1967 Six Day War. Somehow Avi and I both ended up at this little Appalachian college together.

I took my responsibilities seriously and made an effort to get to know everyone in my charge, helping these dorky misfits refine their terrible study habits, teaching them how to separate their laundry items, and tending to some of them while they puked up the consequences of their first binge drinking episodes. I even prevented two ill-placed roommates from killing each other.

A smart young man, Avi figured out who I was at about the same time I realized he was no Israeli Jew. We approached each other cautiously at first. This was right around the time of the Israeli military invasion of Lebanon during that nation’s civil war, with the stated purpose of wiping out PLO enclaves from which terror attacks were launched on Northern Israel. The ensuing bloody chaos and atrocities splashed over television screens throughout the year and beyond.

I give Avi full credit for deciding that I posed no threat, and for leveling with me about who he was and where he came from. What began as a kind of elephant-in-the-room situation where we would talk around the obvious, eventually evolved into long dorm room conversations stretching late into the night. We discussed the war and its causes to the extent that we could understand them. We also talked about our families, and I became enthralled with the story of his.

Prior to this moment in my life, in Hebrew School, during Shabbat services and High Holy Days, at Sunday School, and around the family dinner table, the Arab-Israeli conflict was framed as a simple morality play between good and evil. Every Jewish kid can recall the moment he or she first became aware of antisemitism and the Holocaust. We watched in horror as the terrorist massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics unfolded on our television screens. The narrative of Israel’s founding and its triumphant perseverance against all odds could only be understood through a prism of righteousness, heroism, and Jewish exceptionalism. Arabs were inevitably caricatured as violent, beastly creatures bereft of humanity, culture, and civilization.

This narrative began to unravel as I got to know Avi, who lent me books by Palestinian authors and told me stories about how he and his family lived under occupation. This may have been my first realization that my history education up to that point was limited, simplistic, flawed, and in some cases, deliberately falsified. Thoughtful, historically-literate Americans are familiar with this epiphany, of course. Perhaps Avi had a parallel experience in getting to know me, reevaluating his understanding of history and his feelings about Jews.

I cannot know for sure, because after that year Avi and I never saw each other again. He never returned to school. His homeland remained convulsed in violence throughout most of the 1980s. Next came a few sporadic lulls in the 1990s, followed by the metastasizing, intractable bloodshed of the twenty-first century, culminating in today’s scenes of machine gunned children, parents and grandparents, beheaded corpses, and cramped, squalid slums leveled by some of the most sophisticated weapons systems known to man. For all I know, Avi never lived long enough to complete his education, get married, raise a family, and build a life.

I do know that he lived long enough to send me a package from East Jerusalem while I was at home during the summer between my junior and senior years. I opened the box, and on top of the wrapped gift I found a letter he composed thanking me for helping him through his first year of college and for the interesting talks we had. He mentioned no plans for the upcoming school year. I unwrapped the gift–a Menorah he purchased in the crowded open air markets of East Jerusalem, where somehow Muslims, Christians, Jews, and secular tourists wandered the streets together in search of bargains. All under the watchful eyes of automatic weapons-toting soldiers, of course.

I lost the letter, but not the Menorah. In fact, I see it now on a bookshelf across from where I sit writing this piece. In one sense it stands as a lonely, poignant testament to enduring humanity and an unlikely friendship forged between two kids who were supposed to hate each other but chose not to. In another, it seems to mock our species’ abject failure to learn how to live together as neighbors without seeking to exploit, oppress, dispossess, and slaughter each other.

A few years after I met Avi, I began a rewarding career as a history teacher which now spans forty years. Today, however, I have nothing to offer beyond the heartbreak and remembrance which impelled me to write this. I still believe an understanding of history must be a prerequisite for any hope of human progress. Yet today I wonder if more often than not history, like religion, becomes weaponized to serve misguided or evil purposes. Now it seems as if a long life devoted to an effort to understand history leaves me empty and understanding nothing.

I cannot remember if Avi’s Menorah has ever been lit at Hanukkah–it has sat dormant for many decades now. I will resolve to light it this year, perhaps in one last attempt to rekindle lost hope.

Oct 11, 2023

‘Brutally honest’ with the Vatican

2014_EuroTrip_1988.jpg

Not at all surprised that no one’s paying attention to the church on sex. Is anyone?

VATICAN CITY (AP) — The Vatican conceded Thursday that most Catholics reject its teachings on sex and contraception as intrusive and irrelevant and officials pledged not to “close our eyes to anything” when it opens a two-year debate on some of the thorniest issues facing the church.

Core church doctrine on the nature of marriage, sexuality, abortion and divorce isn’t expected to change as a result of the debate that opens in October. But Pope Francis is well aware that the church has lost much of its relevance and credibility in today’s secular world and he is seeking to redirect his ministers to offer families, and even gays in civil unions, a “new language” that is welcoming and responds to their needs.

The Vatican on Thursday issued the working document for the synod discussions, which in itself marked a sharp change from past practice: The Vatican sent out a 39-point questionnaire seeking input from ordinary Catholics around the world about their understanding of, and adherence to, the church’s teaching on sexuality, homosexuality, contraception, marriage and divorce.

Thousands of ordinary Catholics, clergy and academics responded, providing the Vatican with an unprecedented compilation of grass-root data to guide the discussion. Usually, such working papers are compiled by bishops alone.

The responses, which were summarized in the working document, were brutally honest.

“A vast majority” of responses stressed that “the moral evaluation of the different methods of birth control is commonly perceived today as an intrusion in the intimate life of the couple and an encroachment on the autonomy of conscience,” the document said.

“Many responses recommend that for many Catholics the concept of ‘responsible parenthood’ encompasses the shared responsibility in conscience to choose the most appropriate method of birth control.”

At least I did this right

Homework Help!

As a parent, I spend a lot of time feeling guilty. So I was happy to read this.

I wasn’t involved with my kids’ education — not the way parents today are. But I always had a pretty clear idea that homework was for the kids, not me, and all I did was check to make sure it was done. I didn’t go over it with them, and I didn’t coach them. I told them if they really didn’t understand something in their homework, they were to ask the teacher the next day.

And no, I never volunteered at their schools, although I did join the PTO.

Many of my friends are appalled when I tell them this, and it made me feel guilty. It honestly didn’t occur to me to be any other way, but my kids are both smart people and I don’t think anything I did changed that. Okay, maybe a little.

What I did do was expose them to a lot of politics, art, music and culture, and kept a lot of different reading material around the house. They knew I cared about how they did in school, but that was their job and there was no hovering. I was working 50-60 hours a week, there was no time to hover. The only time I ever intervened was when one of my kids had learning difficulties.

And fortunately, my hands-off approach turned out to be the right thing:

One of the central tenets of raising kids in America is that parents should be actively involved in their children’s education: meeting with teachers, volunteering at school, helping with homework, and doing a hundred other things that few working parents have time for. These obligations are so baked into American values that few parents stop to ask whether they’re worth the effort.

Until this January, few researchers did, either. In the largest-ever study of how parental involvement affects academic achievement, Keith Robinson, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Austin, and Angel L. Harris, a sociology professor at Duke, mostly found that it doesn’t. The researchers combed through nearly three decades’ worth of longitudinal surveys of American parents and tracked 63 different measures of parental participation in kids’ academic lives, from helping them with homework, to talking with them about college plans, to volunteering at their schools. In an attempt to show whether the kids of more-involved parents improved over time, the researchers indexed these measures to children’s academic performance, including test scores in reading and math.

What they found surprised them. Most measurable forms of parental involvement seem to yield few academic dividends for kids, or even to backfire—regardless of a parent’s race, class, or level of education.

Do you review your daughter’s homework every night? Robinson and Harris’s data, published in The Broken Compass: Parental Involvement With Children’s Education, show that this won’t help her score higher on standardized tests. Once kids enter middle school, parental help with homework can actually bring test scores down, an effect Robinson says could be caused by the fact that many parents may have forgotten, or never truly understood, the material their children learn in school.

It’s interesting, go read the rest.

Men on top

nuns

Business as usual in Vatican City!

Pope Francis has reaffirmed Pope Benedict XVI’s rebuke of the main leadership group of U.S. Catholic sisters and approved a plan to place the group under the control of three U.S. bishops, according to the Vatican.

Reaffirmation of the move came in a meeting Monday between the leaders of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) and Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller, the head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, according to a statement from the Vatican.

During the meeting, the Vatican said, Müller told the LCWR leaders that he had “recently discussed” the issue with Pope Francis, “who reaffirmed the findings of the Assessment and the program of reform.”

The meeting was the first between LCWR, which represents about 80 percent of the United States’ approximately 57,000 sisters, and Müller, who became head of the doctrinal congregation in July.

LCWR confirmed that its leadership met with Vatican officials in a statement Monday and said the conversation was “open and frank.”

I hope the nuns tell them to fuck off, metaphorically speaking.

Life after killing OBL

It still astounds me how we eat our young –how poorly we take care of the troops after using them. CJR has an interview with the Seal team member who killed Osama bin Laden:

“No one who fights for this country overseas should ever have to fight for a job,” Barack Obama said last Veterans’ Day, “or a roof over their head, or the care that they have earned when they come home.”


But the Shooter will discover soon enough that when he leaves after sixteen years in the Navy, his body filled with scar tissue, arthritis, tendonitis, eye damage, and blown disks, here is what he gets from his employer and a grateful nation:


Nothing. No pension, no health care, and no protection for himself or his family.


Since Abbottabad, he has trained his children to hide in their bathtub at the first sign of a problem as the safest, most fortified place in their house. His wife is familiar enough with the shotgun on their armoire to use it. She knows to sit on the bed, the weapon’s butt braced against the wall, and precisely what angle to shoot out through the bedroom door, if necessary. A knife is also on the dresser should she need a backup.


Then there is the “bolt” bag of clothes, food, and other provisions for the family meant to last them two weeks in hiding.


“Personally,” his wife told me recently, “I feel more threatened by a potential retaliatory terror attack on our community than I did eight years ago,” when her husband joined ST6.