New FBI records on 9/11 terror activities in Florida

saudihouse

Dan Christensen and Anthony Summers of BrowardBulldog.org have been literal bulldogs in pushing the U.S. for information about the activities of 9/11 hijackers in Florida — and how much the U.S. knew. For years, the FBI has been denying they even investigated Florida connections. Fascinating:

Freshly released, but heavily-censored FBI documents include tantalizing new information about events connected to the Sarasota Saudis who moved suddenly out of their home, leaving behind clothing, jewelry and cars, about two weeks before the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The documents were released to BrowardBulldog.org Monday amid ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation. The news organization sued in 2012 after being denied access to the Bureau’s file on a once secret investigation focusing on Abdulaziz al-Hijji, his wife, Anoud and her father Esam Ghazzawi, an advisor to a Saudi prince.
Continue reading “New FBI records on 9/11 terror activities in Florida”

Gaza is burning

gazaattack

While they observe the funeral of three Israeli teenagers (the children of squatters), the Israelis are once again bombing the shit out of Gaza. To them, all Palestinians are the same. No mention on the major news outlets (Fox did mention a “surgical strike” against Hamas on the tail end of the funeral story) but if this is surgery, it’s closer to butchery.

And if you’ll look at the picture in the lower left-hand corner, that’s white phosphorus aka “willy pete.” Using it in a populated area is a war crime, because it burns down to the bone and doesn’t stop. Israel used it the last time, denied they used it, and then finally admitted they used it more than a year after — but only for “illumination.”

Pennsyltucky budget process

TomCorbett

God, I hate PA Republicans. Just hate them. If the Capitol building collapsed and killed all of them, I’d say, “Oh, that’s such a shame.” But on the inside, I wouldn’t care.

Sen. Chuck McIlhinney (R., Bucks) said in a statement that he voted against it because he was angry about the budget plan’s allowance of additional gas drilling on state forest lands to raise revenue.

Senate Republicans had been willing to consider raising revenue through tax increases – including a new tax on the extraction of natural gas from the Marcellus Shale – but Republicans in the House took a hard line against any new or increased taxes.

Under the Republican plan, spending would increase by about 2.5 percent over the previous year – but the package also adds $220 million to that year’s budget. Though there would be increases for public schools and social safety-net programs, they are not what Corbett originally asked for when he unveiled his proposal this year.

For instance, Republicans are seeking to pare back Corbett’s “Ready to Learn” program from $240 million to $100 million. Philadelphia stands to receive $33.7 million under Ready to Learn.

Republicans have also been unable to agree on a plan to rein in the cost of public employee pensions. The Senate late Monday did pass a bill that would require elected officials, including legislators, judges, the governor, and the attorney general, to move into a 401(k)-style plan.

But that is a far cry from the overhaul Corbett is seeking, which would affect all new employees.

On Sunday, Corbett and House Republican leaders had given Philadelphia Democrats an ultimatum: Vote for the GOP pension plan in return for Republican support for an increase to the cigarette tax in the city.

Democrats criticized the ultimatum as political horse trading that holds the welfare of Philadelphia schoolchildren hostage.

One of my friends just suggested we secede from the state and form our own. After all, we send a lot more money to the state than they send back!

H/t Shawn Sukumar Attorney at Law.

Why one reporter left 60 Minutes

Don Hewitt

Not all that shocking to me, since I was in the news business, but indicative of just what we’re up against with TV news. (What some people won’t do to avoid the horrible Hamptons traffic!) If you’ve paid attention to 60 Minutes stories through the years, you’ve noticed that 1) they punch down, not up and 2) they lean on questionable leaked info. Charles Lewis in Politico:

But I had also seen things at two networks that had troubled me profoundly: nationally important stories not pursued; well-connected, powerful people and companies with questionable policies and practices that were not investigated precisely because of the connections and the power they boasted.
My last 60 Minutes segment, “Foreign Agent,” featured well-known former U.S. officials and presidential campaign aides from both parties who were cashing in on their political connections by working as lobbyists or investment bankers for foreign entities. One of the latter was former Commerce Secretary Pete Peterson, at the time the CEO of the New York-based investment firm Blackstone and, more important, one of Don Hewitt’s closest personal friends. The two men were so close that Don would often join Peterson on his company helicopter for Friday-night flights to the Hamptons, thereby avoiding the summertime bumper-to-bumper traffic.

The script we’d written included the line, “For Japan and other foreign interests, finding former U.S. officials to do their bidding is not at all difficult,” accompanied by the image of a Japanese newspaper advertisement with five smiling Blackstone officials, extolling their prior U.S. government service and connections. The translation of the ad read, “If you are thinking about developing a new business or an investment strategy … that will be effective in the U.S., by all means, consult us!”

During the production process, when I showed Mike Wallace the photo I’d had shipped from Tokyo, Mike said, “That’s not our story—you’re not filming that.” And I countered, “Mike, what are you talking about? This is the nut of the story—former officials trading on the prestige of their former positions, trying to make a buck with foreign companies and governments.” Wallace and I had a huge expletive-filled shouting match, toe to toe, our faces close; I refused to back down, and he stormed out. We put the picture in the piece.

The first time Don screened the piece, he quipped, “I guess I’m not going to get any more rides on Pete’s helicopter.” But as the days and weeks wore on, with the piece not green-lighted for air—ostensibly because it was “too long”—I realized that I had no choice but to find some sort of editorial compromise, which was offensive to me then and, quite frankly, still is.

One day, while I was on the phone, Don walked into my office and asked whether I’d found a way to “fix” the piece.

“Yes,” I said, and I suggested that we remove Peterson’s name from the script and replace it with the name of another well-known Blackstone official, former Reagan budget director David Stockman. It was a nanosecond shorter—two syllables instead of three—and it solved the unstated, real problem that Don had with the story. Don smiled, said “Terrific,” and left the room, which meant the segment had just been approved for air that Sunday.

I picked up the open phone receiver and resumed my conversation with one of the segment interviewees, Pat Choate, the Ph.D. economist and author who later ran for vice president on the Ross Perot ticket in 1996. I asked Pat, “Did you hear all that?” And he replied, “Every word.”

Go read the rest. You’ll never feel the same way about 60 Minutes again.

H/t Attorney Shawn Sukumar.