Taibbi: Time To Boycott Fox

Matt Taibbi draws the obvious parallel between Fox News and the infamous Radio Rwanda broadcasts (something I’ve thought about myself) and wonders why we aren’t boycotting Fox:

A lot of Tea Party anger is driven by real local issues — where I live in central Jersey, for instance, there are a lot of pissed-off white people crowing over a nutty state supreme court case in which a Central American drunk driver got off because cops didn’t explain the consequences of refusing a breathalyzer in his native Spanish. But without the constant reinforcement of national 24-hour media, which has taken these isolated cases and presented them as a coast-to-coast massive conspiracy, the rage over stories like this would never reach the levels we’re seeing.

In fact if you follow Fox News and the Limbaugh/Hannity afternoon radio crew, this summer’s blowout has almost seemed like an intentional echo of the notorious Radio Rwanda broadcasts “warning” Hutus that they were about to be attacked and killed by conspiring Tutsis, broadcasts that led to massacres of Tutsis by Hutus acting in “self-defense.” A sample of some of the stuff we’ve seen and heard on the air this year:

On July 12, Glenn Beck implied that the Obama government was going to aid the New Black Panther Party in starting a race war, with the ultimate aim of killing white babies. “They want a race war. We must be peaceful people. They are going to poke, and poke, and poke, and our government is going to stand by and let them do it.” He also said that “we must take the role of Martin Luther King, because I do not believe that Martin Luther King believed in, ‘Kill all white babies.'”

CNN contributor and Redstate.com writer Erick Erickson, on the Panther mess: “Republican candidates nationwide should seize on this issue. The Democrats are giving a pass to radicals who advocate killing white kids in the name of racial justice and who try to block voters from the polls.”

[…] There’s nothing in the world more tired than a progressive blogger like me flipping out over the latest idiocies emanating from the Fox News crowd. But this summer’s media hate-fest is different than anything we’ve seen before. What we’re watching is a calculated campaign to demonize blacks, Mexicans, and gays and convince a plurality of economically-depressed white voters that they are under imminent legal and perhaps even physical attack by a conspiracy of leftist nonwhites. They’re telling these people that their government is illegitimate and criminal and unironically urging secession and revolution.

The Fox/Rush/Savage crowd in the last 18 months has taken the anti-Muslim fervor that launched a phony war in Iraq, carried George Bush to re-election, and pushed through the Patriot Act, and re-directed that anger at a domestic nonwhite enemy. In doing so they’ve achieved a perfect storm of political cross-purposes: they’ve almost completely succeeded in distracting the public from the real causes of their economic misfortune (i.e. Wall Street corruption), they’ve re-energized a Republican party that was devastated by eight years of Bush-era corruption and incompetence, and, as usual, they’ve made Rupert Murdoch a sh*tload of money.

I’m convinced that none of the key actors here – the Wall Street banks shrieking about government takeovers and advertising on Rick Santelli’s CNBC, the Republican Party’s career hacks who have been scheming for a new horse to ride ever since Bush imploded, and the right-wing TV and radio networks – none of these actors is pushing this crazy movement out of any real desire to stoke a race war. For these institutional leaders and patrons of the Tea Party movement, this is all about material expediency: overcoming the real threat of new financial regulations after the crash, winning elections, and making TV profits. It’s just our bad luck that driving frustrated/broke white suburbanites into a race-hatred frenzy happens to be good business for these folks. And all of this is race-baiting-for-cash is borne out of the same short-term, indifferent-to-consequence thinking that we saw from the Wall Street guys in recent years — who created mountains of deadly leverage capable of destroying the global financial system for the sake of a few one-year bonuses.

The fact that Fox and co. are doing what they do for these dreary commercial reasons makes it even worse, of course; at least Hitler really hated Jewish people. But that also means there’s a bright side. One of the few positives in this Tea Party phenomenon is that it’s shown how quickly masses of Americans can be convinced to completely change their minds about sh*t. The same Americans who six or seven years ago were looking skyward in search of poison-distributing Saddam-drones and buying duct tape and bottled water to protect themselves against imminent Muslim attack are now probably not spending five minutes a week worrying about Muslim terrorists — and instead arming themselves against the coming black-Mexican-leftist-communist state. To me that indicates that if Fox and Glenn Beck can be induced to jerk off to some perhaps similarly profitable but less toxic hate-fantasy (midgets from New Zealand are taking our jobs!), all of this – well, it maybe won’t go away, but it won’t have us steaming toward widespread racial violence like we are now.

I’m beginning to wonder why effective boycotts against these hate-media channels, and particularly Fox, haven’t been organized yet. Why not just pick out one Fox advertiser at random and make an example out of it? How about Subaru and their unintentionally comic “Love” slogan? I actually like their cars, but what the f**k? How about Pep Boys and that annoying logo of theirs? Just to prove that it can be done, I’d like to see at least one firm get blown out of business as a consequence of financially supporting the network that is telling America that its black president wants to kill white babies. Isn’t that at least the first move here? It’s beginning to strike me that sitting by and doing nothing about this madness is not a terribly responsible way to behave.

8 thoughts on “Taibbi: Time To Boycott Fox

  1. That is a big step for someone in the MCM to take, even for Taibbi.

    But, if the MCMers can ignore Jane Mayers’ Kochtopus report, I guess they can ignore Taibbe. Even more than they have.

    Yikes.

    And, as to driving FOX out of business or, better, to near normal journalism..that would be great. I recall during the aftermath of 9/11 that most stations went all news all the time. FOX was on 24 hours on broadcast TV and in the late night hours they broadcast their international news (from Britain, iirc). Watching that FOX was like watching a different station from a different world! It was informative and not belligerently Republican/anti-Dem. Amazing.

  2. One would think that liberals, of ALL people, would question the wisdom of silencing dissenting speech…

    Michale32086

  3. And you wonder why people call you a troll? This is why. And by the way, I know you’ve also been kicked off other sites — for trolling.

    Inciting hatred and violence against ethnic minorities is not “dissenting speech,” and putting people’s lives at risk is not some kind of game. Were the events leading up to Kristalnacht “dissenting speech”?

    One more remark like this, and you’re banned. This is my online living room, and when your behavior crosses the line and offends the other guests, you’re gone.

  4. Thanks for standing up to this troll, Susie. YES! I, for one, find the Limbaughs, Becks, and Palins a little too much like what I used to think was a long-ago dead era. Seems that the election of a mixed-race president has re-invigorated all the closet klanspeople, and I know that a shitty ecnonomy—-the same as Hitler’s Germany after WWI—-has added fuel to FOX’S fire. No, it ain’t censorship—- as that idiot Michale implies—-to take action and boycott the hatefulness coming from that station’s air: to not speak out against that type of talk IS irresponsible!

  5. Michale32086, it is perfectly in line with our form of government for consumers to voice their opinions in this way. It’s not the government shutting them down by boycotting. It’s citizens deciding where they want to spend their money. The right does this all the time. Why is it okay for them but not for lefty orgs? I have never understood that. It’s bizarre.

  6. Whoaaa… I am glad I came back to this commentary…

    Susie,

    And you wonder why people call you a troll? This is why. And by the way, I know you’ve also been kicked off other sites — for trolling.

    No, I have been kicked off other sites because those people like Cesca and Osborne can’t handle rational dissent. Their sites are nothing but echo chambers where you have to toe the company line or else…

    The simple fact that I have been posting to chrisweigant.com for over 5 years now is testament to these facts…

    Inciting hatred and violence against ethnic minorities is not “dissenting speech,” and putting people’s lives at risk is not some kind of game. Were the events leading up to Kristalnacht “dissenting speech”?

    Oh come’on Susie… Let’s be rational here.. Of course inciting hatred and violence is not protected speech..

    But there is as much inciting hatred from the Left as there is from the Right.. Do you know how many times I have read on Leftist Blogospeheres about how guys like Beck and Hannity and Rush should be killed and tortured..

    The Left likes to think that they are above such hatred and such… But, the simple fact is, the hysterical Left and the hysterical Right are identical in this regard…

    One more remark like this, and you’re banned. This is my online living room, and when your behavior crosses the line and offends the other guests, you’re gone.

    “There can be no offense, where none is taken.”
    -Sarek Of Vulcan

    As has been well established by your own readers, I am not a troll.

    If you want to ban me then at least be honest with yourself and everyone else.

    You are banning me, simply because you A) Don’t like what I have to say and B) you can’t debate rationally about the topics…

    Babba,

    , it is perfectly in line with our form of government for consumers to voice their opinions in this way. It’s not the government shutting them down by boycotting. It’s citizens deciding where they want to spend their money. The right does this all the time. Why is it okay for them but not for lefty orgs? I have never understood that. It’s bizarre.

    Actually, I think all calls for boycotts are utterly ridiculous and immature.. Ironically enough, it’s usually the people that are trying to be protected that end up getting the most pain from the boycotts.. The NAACP boycott of the Southern States and the boycott of Arizona are two perfect examples of moronic boycotts that hurt the very people that the boycotters SAY they are trying to protect..

    Calls for boycotts are about the EGO of the boycotters… Nothing more..

    I have my own personal boycotts that are based on my own personal beliefs and principles.. I would never be so arrogant or egotistical to try and impose or encourage MY beliefs or my boycotts on others…

    Michale32086

  7. Here is a perfect example of the virulence of the Left..

    “I AM FOR A SATANIC DEATH CULT CENTER AT FOX NEWS HQ AND OUTSIDE THE OFFICES ORDICK ARMEYAND NEWT GINGRICH-and all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS,”
    -John Cusack

    So if we want to discuss issues of inciting hatred and violence, then by all means, let’s discuss it.

    But let us discuss it like rational and mature adults without any name-calling or threats…

    Hmmmmm?????

    Michale32086

Comments are closed.