They know they can’t steal this one, so they are trying to stop it completely:
Suck it up, snowflake.
Fitzgerald wouldn’t offer an opinion on whether Reynolds’ ruling was a correct interpretation of the law, but said it creates headaches for local elections officials, particularly with possible overlapping nomination paper and absentee ballot deadlines for the August primary and November general election. He said Reynolds didn’t consider those practical effects in her ruling. “The logistics of this is very messy,” Fitzgerald said. “I don’t think Judge Reynolds considered that at all how this would transpire in the real world. … The average taxpayer is going to be like, ‘You’re kidding me.’”
It is not that hard to hold an election. Unless, of course, you don’t want to hold an election. Then it becomes very hard. And I’ve searched the law high and low and I have yet to find an exemption for a town clerk’s headaches. Try an aspirin and do your job.
2 thoughts on “Wisconsin will do anything to avoid holding special election”
Comments are closed.
Republicans are the enemy and they should be defeated wherever they are found.
Maybe the Koch’s and Walker are looking at the elections in Egypt for guidance on how to hold an election, but not really hold an election.
Egypt is a dictatorship run by General El-Sissi. Trump likes authoritarian leaders who pretend to hold elections but really don’t.
Dictator Erdogan of Turkey is another Trump favorite.
At least Iran practices a modicum of small “d” democracy in their country. More then one person runs for the presidency unlike in China.
Scott Walker is a corrupt plutocrat who works for several corrupt oligarchs including the Koch’s The whole lot are undemocratic Fascists.
The timing problems are entirely of their making.