Nice piece in the Daily News. They’ve been organizing here in PA for the past few years, and I’m happy they’re here.
Category: Power to the People
Ventura/Stern 2016?
http://youtu.be/9MA0PGGg0i4
Jesse Ventura says he and Howard Stern couldn’t possibly fuck things up any worse than the people in there now. I don’t know about that; he’s prone to saying some really stupid, paranoid shit and doesn’t understand about the debt. He does say some things I like, but no one would ever let him implement his policies.
More Income Inequality…
The median household income has fallen for the 5th year in a row…
Median household income fell for the fifth straight year in 2012, the Census Bureau reported on Tuesday, to $51,017. That was the lowest annual income, adjusted for inflation, since 1995.
The typical American family’s income has fallen every year since 2007, the year the Great Recession began, for a cumulative decline of 8.3 percent. Median income is also down 9 percent from its record high of $56,080, set two recessions ago in 1999. (Story continues below depressing chart.)
While median income has fallen, the incomes of top earners have continued to rise, making income inequality worse. The Census Bureau’s measure of inequality, known as the “Gini index,” held steady at 0.477 in 2012, but at the record high set in 2011. A Gini index of 0 means perfect income equality, an index of 1 means one person would get all of the nation’s income. We’re slowly grinding our way towards 1.
What is the aftermath of the Great recession and the (a-hem) “recovery” in America today? Jay Bookman found some statistics, in a study by Emmanuel Saez of UC Berkeley…
— Between 2009 and 2012, the top earning 1 percent of U.S. households collected 95 percent of household income growth. The remaining 99 percent of American households made do by fighting over the leftover 5 percent.
— Overall, income for the top 1 percent grew by 31.4 percent in the last three years. Income for everybody else grew by 0.4 percent.
— During the Great Recession of 2007-2009, incomes for the lowest-earning 99 percent of U.S. households fell by 11.6 percent, “the largest fall on record in any two-year period since the Great Depression.”
— The share of national income going to the top 0.01 percent of households — in 2012, that’s the roughly 16,000 households that earn more than $10.25 million a year — is now higher than it was at its previous historic peak of 1928. As Saez notes, that was “the peak of the stock market bubble in the ‘roaring’ 1920s,” just prior to the Great Depression.
— Forty years ago, the highest-earning 1 percent of households collected roughly 9 percent of national income. Today, those households collect roughly 23 percent of national income. Today, the top-earning 0.01 percent of households collects five times as much of the national income as they did 40 years ago. I know that we’re supposed to believe that today’s 0.01 percent must therefore be working five times as hard as their counterparts did in the 1970s, but forgive me if I don’t buy it.
– For the first time in the near-century for which such data is available, the top 10 percent of U.S. households — those with 2012 incomes of $114,000 and above — now account for more than 50 percent of overall household income. Forty years ago, that top 10 percent earned roughly a third of the national household income, leaving 67 percent to be spread among their fellow Americans. And again, most of that concentration is concentrated even more tightly at the very top.
Once again, the Randian myths that have been fed to Americans for a generation were just fairy tales. American worker productivity is at its highest and the reward that we all were told would come with “doing the right things” is going elsewhere…
This is from 2007 and it has gotten worse…
Best fundraiser idea ever
Want to have lunch with Sen. Jeff Markley and Elizabeth Warren? Donate $3, you have a shot!
So far, so good
The city of Richmond, Calif., moved a step closer to implementing a novel plan to restructure mortgages using its powers of eminent domain when a judge Thursday declined for now to grant an injunction sought by several of the nation’s largest mortgage investors.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled on Thursday that bondholders’ request to grant an injunction wasn’t yet ripe, meaning the city wasn’t far enough along in its mortgage-seizure initiative for the court to intervene.
Bond investors sued Richmond in federal court in San Francisco last month, arguing that the city’s loan-condemnation plan is unconstitutional and that it doesn’t serve a valid public purpose. Units of Wells Fargo & Co. and Deutsche Bank AG filed the lawsuit on behalf of investors that include BlackRock Inc. and Pacific Investment Management Co., as well as government-controlled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Judge Breyer declined to rule Thursday on the broader arguments raised in the case. He said he would rule Monday on the city’s motion to dismiss the case. If the case isn’t dismissed, bondholders could renew their request for an injunction once the city appears poised to condemn loans.
At a city council hearing late Tuesday, Richmond leaders rejected a resolution that would have pulled the plug on the eminent-domain effort and agreed to a separate resolution, on a 4-3 vote, to move ahead with the plan. The city would have to vote again to begin seizing loans, which would take place in state court.
If that happens, one possible outcome of the current court challenge is that the banks would instead need to seek an injunction in state court.
“It’s Richmond two and Wall Street zero” because investors’ attempts to “bully and intimidate” the city had failed at city hall and in court, said Amy Schur, a campaign director for a group called the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, which supports the eminent-domain plan.
[…]The city is seeking to forcibly acquire mortgages on homes that have fallen sharply in value, leaving borrowers “underwater.” The plan would work like this: for a home with an existing $300,000 mortgage that now has a market value of $150,000, Richmond might argue the loan is worth only $120,000. If a judge agreed, the city’s financial backers would fund the seizure of the loan, paying the current loan investors that reduced amount.
Then, they could offer to help the homeowner refinance into a new $145,000, 30-year mortgage backed by a government agency. That would leave $25,000 in profit, minus the origination costs, to be divided between the city and Mortgage Resolution Partners, the private firm advancing the eminent-domain plan.
Wall Street is freaking out over this in a big way, because there’s no way they can make money and they lose everything because of their greed. Oh dear! Stay tuned, it’s not over yet…
Jobs Report….
Very meager gains in last month’s employment numbers.
From the Bureau of Labor Statistics…
Both the number of unemployed persons, at 11.3 million, and the
unemployment rate, at (U3) 7.3 percent, changed little in August. The
jobless rate is down from 8.1 percent a year ago….
In August, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27
weeks or more) was about unchanged at 4.3 million. These individuals
accounted for 37.9 percent of the unemployed. Over the past 12 months,
the number of long-term unemployed has declined by 733,000…
In August, 2.3 million persons were marginally attached to the labor
force, down by 219,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not
seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force,
wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime
in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because
they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.
Among the marginally attached, there were 866,000 discouraged workers
in August, essentially unchanged from a year earlier. (The data are
not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not
currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available
for them. The remaining 1.5 million persons marginally attached to the
labor force in August had not searched for work for reasons such as
school attendance or family responsibilities.
The U6 numbers, that factor in people who work part-time even though they want full-time jobs and discouraged workers who want jobs but have given up looking within the past year in the calculation is at 13.7%.
Georgia is at 8.8%, U3. Ugh.
NSFW….
http://youtu.be/mjkX4oqG4CA
Why I love Code Pink
Campaign for local power
Civil rights pioneer on how women were silenced at the March on Washington
Really interesting interview, check it out:
Fifty years ago this week, Martin Luther King Jr., John Lewis, A Philip Randolph, Bayard Rustin and other civil rights leaders spoke at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. But where were the female civil rights activists? At the historic march, only one woman spoke for just more than a minute: Daisy Bates of the NAACP. Today we are joined by civil rights pioneer Gloria Richardson, the co-founder of the Cambridge Nonviolent Action Committee in Maryland, which fought to desegregate public institutions like schools and hospitals. While Richardson was on the program for the March on Washington, when she stood to speak she only had a chance to say hello before the microphone was seized. Richardson is the subject of a pending biography by Joseph R. Fitzgerald, “The Struggle is Eternal: Gloria Richardson and Black Liberation.” Richardson, 91, joins us to discuss the 1963 March on Washington and the censorship of women speakers; the Cambridge Movement to desegregate Maryland; her friendship with Malcolm X; and her assessment of President Obama and the civil rights struggle today.
TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
Continue reading “Civil rights pioneer on how women were silenced at the March on Washington”
