‘Choice’? Hah

Picture this: You’ve recently been through exhausting rounds of chemotherapy and radiation, you’ve been puking your guts up and your doctor warns you this is a particularly malignant cancer.

Then you find out through some miracle (or bizarre irony) that you’re pregnant.

Your doctor warns you the chemo and radiation has put the fetus at risk. She also says the pregnancy could make it harder to effectively treat the cancer. You have a difficult decision ahead of you.

Hah hah, only kidding! That decision’s already been made for you:

Women’s health and rights advocacy groups responded immediately to yesterday’s announcement that President Obama would exclude abortion coverage from the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (the temporary high-risk insurance pools created by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to transition us into the new health care plan). Obama has decided that women in these pools simply don’t need insurance coverage of abortion care even though there is nothing in the new law that dictates this.From the ACLU press release on this:

Even using their own private funds, individuals would not be able to buy policies that cover abortion in these pools. The only exemptions would reportedly be for women who have been raped, who are the victims of incest or who will likely die if they carry the pregnancy to term.

What is perhaps most perplexing about this is that this plan was created to offer temporary insurance coverage to those who cannot afford coverage due to particulary serious health conditions. Women with serious health conditions may be some of the most affected by a pregnancy – the pregnancy may not cause her death but is a woman’s life of so little consequence that it matters not to President Obama if a pregnancy bears an immense burden on her already ill body? As NARAL Pro-Choice America’s Nancy Keenan puts it, “This policy means that women who are part of these pools because they have significant health problems, such as diabetes or cancer, will not be able to access abortion care, even if their health is at further risk.”

Planned Parenthood’s press release calls the rule “harmful to women”:

“The very women who need to purchase private health insurance in the new high-risk pools are likely to be more vulnerable to medically complicated pregnancies. It is truly harmful to these women that the administration may impose limits on how they use their own private dollars, limiting their health care options at a time when they need them most. This decision has no basis in the law and flies in the face of the intent of the high-risk pools that were meant to meet the medical needs of some of the most vulnerable women in this country.”

The Center for Reproductive Rights notes:

“Contrary to assertions by the White House, there’s no current legal basis for the policy. The executive order issued by the President on abortion only addressed rules for segregating funds for abortion coverage in the healthcare exchanges and limits on community health centers. The Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan policy similarly furnishes no legal basis for exclusions in the new high risk pools.”The proposal would not even permit policyholders to use their own private dollars to purchase coverage, as the Nelson compromise allows, and instead applies a Stupak-type ban like the one rejected by Congress. Healthcare reform was a tightly bargained piece of legislation – and with this, the White House is threatening to renege on a fundamental part of its bargain with American women and families who truly need coverage. Excluding abortion coverage from the high-risk insurance pools was not part of the negotiations during healthcare reform, and nothing in the bill compels this result.”

[…] NARAL Pro-Choice America has started a letter writing campaign to urge President Obama not to exclude abortion coverage from the high-risk pools.

5 thoughts on “‘Choice’? Hah

  1. i was going to email you about this yesterday, then realized that NARAL was a day late themselves.
    now, i realize this is my “permanent outrage and relentless negativity fostered and fueled by the blogosphere” talking, but I don’t find this to be very hopey and changey at all.

  2. That’s because nothing gets done in D.C. until they have meetings. And then they have to approve the press release. You can’t believe how slow it is.

  3. So, NARAL needs to retroactively cancel their endorsement of Obama and issue a mea culpa to their donors.

    This generation of women under 40 has taken their right to abortion care for granted to often. If they lose that right, it’s their own fault. I’m very sad for the women who are sick, or who are victims. But this generation has dropped the ball in a staggering way.

  4. Lori, since NARAL supported Mr. Lieberman (over Ned Lamont) they aren’t very reliable on their endorsements.

  5. Think of how much worse it would have been if we hadn’t elected a young, bright, charismatic, liberal, full-of-hope Democrat of color dedicated to positive change and fresh ideas.

Comments are closed.