My neighborhood

Rite Aid - Philadelphia, PA (Northeast)

“What happened to you, you look awful!”

The young woman was speaking to a guy who probably wasn’t more than 50, but he had some real hard miles on him. He was thin and stooped over, and walked in obvious pain with a cane.

“I dunno, the doctor put some kinda shots in my back. Thirteen of them! And now I’m in a lotta pain and can’t hardly walk,” he said. “This is my first day out of bed in a week.”

“Geeze, I seen you last week and you were fine,” she said. “What was in the shots?”

“I dunno, he said it would help. And now, look at me. Hon, could you get me two packs of Marlboros, please?” he said to the drugstore cashier.

And they want to raise the retirement age? Bastards.

Does seeing a shrink make you more suicidal?

Psychiatric cell

A new study suggests a link.

Yet it’s important to recognize that this Danish study has not emerged in isolation. For example, several studies, including one of 100 countries in 2004 and of 191 countries in 2013, have shown links between increasing funding to modern, western-style psychiatric mental health systems and increasing – not decreasing – suicide rates. The authors of those studies did not uncover clear explanations for their findings. And this new Danish study, for its part, has simply more sharply identified the precise junctures in the psychiatric care system that are most strongly linked to those increasing suicide rates.

So we are left to speculate: What might be causing these striking numbers?

There’s no doubt that being treated with powerful psychiatric drugs against your will can be traumatizing for many people. Antidepressants are known to increase suicidal feelings in youth, and other psychiatric medications are strongly linked to increased suicidal feelings shortly after people begin to take them or change dosage levels. Many psychiatric medications also can cause disruptive or debilitating side effects that can have significant negative effects on overall quality of life.

However, I suspect that the real problem is more fundamental: It’s the very idea that “mental illness” is a “brain disease.” This is what most psychiatric professionals believe, and it’s the main message they give to patients seeking their help. This widely propagated idea is a mental-emotional toxic blight upon us all that’s ultimately killing far more people than it’s helping.

It is an unproven theory that psychological difficulties are symptoms of underlying, chronic diseases of the brain that require medications as treatment. No biological markers have yet been found for any syndromes described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Yet thanks to intensive promotion of biological psychiatric theories by pharmaceutical companies, psychiatric professionals and media, most people who’ve never researched the topic themselves quite reasonably assume that it was solidly established years ago that schizophrenia is caused by wayward genes, depression is biochemically induced, and psychiatric medications balance measurable imbalances in brain neurotransmitters.

Those theories help drug company profit margins, and can provide comforting reassurance that many of society’s social ills and life’s most profound pains can be solved with a pill – but they are just theories. Conversely, one need only imagine oneself in the position of patient to see how upsetting, even terrifying or emotionally crushing such an image of “mental illness” can often be.

Picture yourself going through intense, perhaps frightening psychological struggles, and feeling extremely vulnerable, and finally turning to professionals for help. And the first doctor you encounter looks into your eyes and tells you with an aura of authoritative medical certainty that you have an incurable brain disease that will require lifelong medicating with extremely toxic, potentially debilitating drugs just to – hopefully – keep it in check.

If you were feeling despair about your situation and suicidal before that conversation, how about after it?

In this light, a recent study by Emory University and University of Texas psychologists is not surprising, and provides a measure of hope. The researchers conducted a random-controlled trial where they gave a brief science lesson to one group of youth about neuroplasticity, neural pathway development, and other ways that brains can physically, neurologically change in response to lifestyle and thought-pattern changes. The youth who received that lesson experienced significant reductions in depression symptoms.

Of course, substituting psychiatric medications for a fair wage and social programs presents problems, too.

That Harvard study?

Election map: Winning candidate in 2014 mayoral elections of Budapest by individual precinct; inner Pest

The one that said millenials were more likely to turn out and vote Republican? Here’s what Kos has to say:

Here’s the actual study:

While more 18- to 29- year-olds (50 percent-43 percent) surveyed in the IOP’s fall 2014 poll would prefer that Congress be controlled by Democrats instead of Republicans, the numbers improve dramatically for the GOP when only young people who say they will “definitely vote” are studied.

Got that? Millennials are still Democratic, but white millennials will “definitely vote,” whereas brown ones are less likely to say they will. That matters because among likely voters, young African Americans prefer Democratic control 68-23, and Latinos 59-34. Among whites it’s 53-40 Republican. To further hammer the point:

By a significant 12-point margin, 42 percent to 30 percent, a greater proportion of young Republicans say they are definitely going to vote in November than young Democrats.

So news flash, white Republicans are more likely to turn out, even among youngsters. We kinda knew that. That’s the whole point of Democratic GOTV. To fix that problem. This says nothing about long-term trends, and it sure doesn’t support the idiotic media headlines this survey generated from reporters who still don’t know how to read a poll.