32 Flavors
Sep 29th, 2010 at 10:05 pm by susie
Ani DiFranco:
Sep 29th, 2010 at 10:05 pm by susie
Ani DiFranco:
Sep 29th, 2010 at 10:05 pm by susie
Wouldn’t it have been nice to see Obama, just once, punish the people who have so polluted this country for so long?
Wouldn’t it be nice to see someone powerful held accountable for something?
Sep 29th, 2010 at 9:06 pm by susie
Big Star:
Sep 29th, 2010 at 6:27 pm by susie
Tomorrow is my birthday and I CAN’T WAIT!!!!!
Sep 29th, 2010 at 4:17 pm by susie
I was rather publicly vocal about the illegal war in Iraq before we started shock and awe, and I’m sure it was just a coincidence that, for another two years or so, there was an obvious wiretap on my phone. (I mean, even my mother could hear it).
And that’s the kind of thing we’re still looking at in our country.
Did you know Three Cups of Tea was one of the suspicious organizations listed as reasons for the recent FBI raids in Minnesota and Portland? Yes, under the most recent legal distortion of the Patriot Act, contributing to human rights organizations can be construed as “material support for terrorism.”
It took a constitutional law professor to put a thin veneer of respectability to this madness.
Sep 29th, 2010 at 2:40 pm by susie
Ted Rall asked everyone in the audience last night about their most pressing personal and global concerns that the government was in a position to fix. Most people listed education and the environment.
Then he asked how many people thought our government would (no matter who was in power) do anything about those issues. I think two people put their hands up.
He talked about voting as a purely symbolic measure to give people the illusion we’re part of a democracy. Really, do you see anyone running to fix any of this stuff?
Sep 29th, 2010 at 2:33 pm by susie
Blocked by DeMint and Coburn. Can’t have the wimmenfolk getting uppity!
Sep 29th, 2010 at 1:23 pm by susie
Peter Daou has more to say about bloggers and the Obama administration.
Sep 29th, 2010 at 1:17 pm by susie
I’m not crazy about Dan Onorato, but he’s much, much, MUCH better than Tom Corbett and the race is now a statistical dead heat. Last-minute donations will help a lot. If you can spare $10, donate here.
In the Tea Party narrative, victory at the polls means a new American revolution, one that will “take our country back” from everyone they disapprove of. But what they don’t realize is, there’s a catch: This is America, and we have an entrenched oligarchical system in place that insulates us all from any meaningful political change. The Tea Party today is being pitched in the media as this great threat to the GOP; in reality, the Tea Party is the GOP. What few elements of the movement aren’t yet under the control of the Republican Party soon will be, and even if a few genuine Tea Party candidates sneak through, it’s only a matter of time before the uprising as a whole gets castrated, just like every grass-roots movement does in this country. Its leaders will be bought off and sucked into the two-party bureaucracy, where its platform will be whittled down until the only things left are those that the GOP’s campaign contributors want anyway: top-bracket tax breaks, free trade and financial deregulation.
The rest of it — the sweeping cuts to federal spending, the clampdown on bailouts, the rollback ofRoe v. Wade — will die on the vine as one Tea Party leader after another gets seduced by the Republican Party and retrained for the revolutionary cause of voting down taxes for Goldman Sachs executives. It’s all on display here in Kentucky, the unofficial capital of the Tea Party movement, where, ha, ha, the joke turns out to be on them: Rand Paul, their hero, is a fake.
[...] So how does a group of billionaire businessmen and corporations get a bunch of broke Middle American white people to lobby for lower taxes for the rich and deregulation of Wall Street? That turns out to be easy.
Beneath the surface, the Tea Party is little more than a weird and disorderly mob, a federation of distinct and often competing strains of conservatism that have been unable to coalesce around a leader of their own choosing. Its rallies include not only hardcore libertarians left over from the original Ron Paul “Tea Parties,” but gun-rights advocates, fundamentalist Christians, pseudomilitia types like the Oath Keepers (a group of law- enforcement and military professionals who have vowed to disobey “unconstitutional” orders) and mainstream Republicans who have simply lost faith in their party. It’s a mistake to cast the Tea Party as anything like a unified, cohesive movement — which makes them easy prey for the very people they should be aiming their pitchforks at. A loose definition of the Tea Party might be millions of pissed-off white people sent chasing after Mexicans on Medicaid by the handful of banks and investment firms who advertise on Fox and CNBC.
The individuals in the Tea Party may come from very different walks of life, but most of them have a few things in common. After nearly a year of talking with Tea Party members from Nevada to New Jersey, I can count on one hand the key elements I expect to hear in nearly every interview. One: Every single one of them was that exceptional Republican who did protest the spending in the Bush years, and not one of them is the hypocrite who only took to the streets when a black Democratic president launched an emergency stimulus program. (“Not me — I was protesting!” is a common exclamation.) Two: Each and every one of them is the only person in America who has ever read the Constitution or watched Schoolhouse Rock. (Here they have guidance from Armey, who explains that the problem with “people who do not cherish America the way we do” is that “they did not read the Federalist Papers.”) Three: They are all furious at the implication that race is a factor in their political views — despite the fact that they blame the financial crisis on poor black homeowners, spend months on end engrossed by reports about how the New Black Panthers want to kill “cracker babies,” support politicians who think the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was an overreach of government power, tried to enact South African-style immigration laws in Arizona and obsess over Charlie Rangel, ACORN and Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Four: In fact, some of their best friends are black! (Reporters in Kentucky invented a game called “White Male Liberty Patriot Bingo,” checking off a box every time a Tea Partier mentions a black friend.) And five: Everyone who disagrees with them is a radical leftist who hates America.0
It would be inaccurate to say the Tea Partiers are racists. What they are, in truth, are narcissists. They’re completely blind to how offensive the very nature of their rhetoric is to the rest of the country. I’m an ordinary middle-aged guy who pays taxes and lives in the suburbs with his wife and dog — and I’m a radical communist? I don’t love my country? I’m a redcoat? Fuck you! These are the kinds of thoughts that go through your head as you listen to Tea Partiers expound at awesome length upon their cultural victimhood, surrounded as they are by America-haters like you and me or, in the case of foreign-born president Barack Obama, people who are literally not Americans in the way they are.
It’s not like the Tea Partiers hate black people. It’s just that they’re shockingly willing to believe the appalling horseshit fantasy about how white people in the age of Obama are some kind of oppressed minority. That may not be racism, but it is incredibly, earth-shatteringly stupid. I hear this theme over and over — as I do on a recent trip to northern Kentucky, where I decide to stick on a Rand Paul button and sit in on a Tea Party event at a local amusement park. Before long, a group of about a half-dozen Tea Partiers begin speculating about how Obamacare will force emergency-room doctors to consult “death panels” that will evaluate your worth as a human being before deciding to treat you.